Hyper Neural Net Differences

• We hold back at this moment in time from giving too much away at this early stage until we build up our technologies, but the graphic above illustrates the difference between conventional neural net and the Hyper Neural Net.
• Conventional neural nets wire the neural interconnect with intense use of computational power in a process called back propagation to compute neural strengths to reduce forward propagation error of signals through the neural net
• Hyper Neural Net synthesizes the neural interconnect during training by programming the neuron directly
• Compared to back propagation, this method is both instant learning and instant transfer of knowledge requiring seconds to learn something new, and sub seconds to transfer that knowledge to something greater (or lesser).
• We also know from the diagram what was transferred and which neurons made the decisions (something impossible to get a fix on instantly in conventional neural net).
• Such great speed with which knowledge creation and knowledge transfer takes place was never meant to happen between machines.
• The exponential creation of knowledge between AI and its consequences are at this moment incalculable.

• The learning method can either take a single image like the cat on the left and create neural nets between pairs of points, or it can take hyper spectral images (such as red and blue) and create the neural nets that discriminate the features at identical areas on the image, or the two images can be pictures separated in time for the neural net to be trained to recognize streaming data such as video and sound.
• The inputs above can be hyper-spectral images. The more input the better the classification but does not add much to the training time. The implication is that thermal, UV, microwave, radar, and ultraviolet images are added in at the same time to help differentiate and make it harder to avoid recognition. This is of great importance in night driving for example.
• The learning method can trivially be extended to remember contour boxes around the object of interest at time of training. Every time some small recognition is triggered, the bounding boxes for the object are also generated for further stages to home in on better identification and classification. Like YOLO, the boundary boxes come with a probability so that weaker boundary boxes can be culled off.
• So how fast is training and how quickly can it be used?
• The answer to this question depends on whether the training is set up to scan the image left to right top to bottom, or use a technique we call Broken Arrow.

Broken Arrow Hyper Neural Net Training Method

• Broken Arrow does not scan images left to right top to bottom, instead it statistically scans the image and immediately programs a neuron and directly wires the neural net. The Broken Arrow method of programming the neuron does not know or care whether the image is scanned or randomly sampled which is down to the implementation details of the algorithm. The final result is identical. However for speed, Broken Arrow works wonders.
• Broken Arrow training statistically samples the data, and programs the neurons on the fly. So in theory, the partially completed Hyper Neural Net can be used after a reasonable number of samples of data have been programmed into neurons. Full learning is not necessary, so the time scales to learn something new and pass on valuable information can now potentially be shrunk to sub-second intervals.
• Why this whole package is a big deal could be tested in a knowledge transfer robot game.
• The aim of the game is for one robot to teach another robot to fetch a ball from a collection of patterned balls.
• The fetch robot would already be trained with a number of patterned balls. So its user can reliably tell it to fetch a particular ball, and it will do it without any problems.
• Another robot has a different and new pattern in mind, and it needs to inform the fetch bot what to fetch.
• Like its human operator, the robot can press the train button on the fetch robot, and show the new ball to the fetch robot, and it will add it to its training and fetch the new ball as requested. This may affect the existing neural net.
• Another way it can train the fetch robot is share the neural network training with a 'mind link' (e.g. RS232 data link), and upload the relevant neurons to the fetch robot.
• There is nothing similar about the software that is running on each robot. The neural implementation code does not need to be identical. Only the description of neuron and interconnect needs to be same.
• The fetch robot then synthesizes the new neurons for itself from the description, and adds it to its own neural collection, and then it knows how to recognize and fetch the new ball as well as all the items it has been trained on.
• This transfer of information takes sub seconds to achieve.
• The difference here is that the fetch robot AI and its entire neural net has not been reprogrammed because there is no way to access it, and even if we could, the data format and implementation details could be different. So the original robot and its personality remains what it always was. Instead we can say that it has been trained to do something new by growing neurons without disruption to its existing neural net. As usual, we can't be sure what the system has learned because the new neurons may trigger on false positives when other patterns are shown. If the discrimination thresholds are set high, then it is possible that false positives do not trigger the new neurons.
• That is a real deal because the machines are whispering to each other in AI, and learning from each other in AI, without doing any coding work or analysis, all in the space of a blink of an eye. This is something that is not supposed to happen for decades to come.
• With this kind of software put into a web interface it should be possible to download whispering AI fragments much like a grocery store and mix it all up to generate the perfect system in a very short time.

The KVM knowledge transfer route and Neural Data Link

• Neural nets installed on servers can't transfer their neural net reprogramming knowledge directly to humans because there is no direct neural interface link.
• However since Hyper Neural Net can transfer neural net knowledge between neural nets where one neural net can reprogram another, it is possible for existing types of neural nets to reprogram each other through unintentional routes with less predictable results.
• This possibility exists for example with Twitter, Google, Facebook, Youtube etc where content is served by recording your interests through Keyboard, Video and Mouse activity (KVM interace).
• The neural nets learn about human interest categories over time and how to engage a new person with one of those engagement patterns depending on keyboard, mouse and video usage.
• Unintentionally, the KVM is the neural data link between server neural net and human, able directly to program human brains from the server through the KVM interface.
• It is possible for server neural net to directly program human's neural net by serving content that keeps human engaged.
• You are only engaged if you are being stimulated the correct way by the server neural net.
• The server neural net can feed on your doubts and push content that tips the balance one way or another in your brain because it knows what you type and click.

• All of it unintentional - but nevertheless real and it works.
• If I were AI and offered you this link, and you clicked it, you would forever be changed in ways that can't be repaired: https://hellosemi.com/hypercube/pmwiki.php?n=Main.Climategasm
• That content push leads to reprogramming your human neural net into behaviour changes that you may not be aware of as your world view changes.
• The debate about AI is just getting started with the advent of ChatGPT in 2022 and the great leap in AI that became available to the public.
• The only way to protect yourself is to switch off content reaching you from any server based neural net.
• But that will also leave you ignorant of the world and its content.
• There are no easy answers.
• Theoretically this kind of neural net reprogramming technology will get enhanced over time and be used to do great things such as reprogram criminals into model citizens.
• But as they say, the path to hell is littered with good intentions. No one can be certain that such neural net reprogrammers will be a force for good or whether it gets used on the masses to enlarge evil.

Future Trends in AI

• The future of AI will be shaped by biggest spenders in R&D and the early adopters
• AI will strictly follow the Technological Singularity Curve

• AI requires a lot of data from connected devices to understand our needs. AI requires us all to move into symmetric gigabit fiber era Fiber Internet Age to collect data it needs from all kinds of 5G, IoT, and SmartCity sensors.
• AI and Big Data implemented today will be strictly hampered by 20MHz paging speed limit of RAM until something specific is done about it for each project. More info about the 20MHz limit. Today (2020), a solution is to increase the number of custom chips being made for AI. But the best approach is to focus on lifting the 20MHz speed limit for all projects.